Dwayne Monroe brings up the Raunch Feminism discussion again, pointing us at Momus’s blog, Click Opera.
Joanna asks about a surgical procedure that porn actresses apparently get all too frequently: they have surgery to make their labia look smaller. Henwood points out that it’s “supposed to” look small and tight — with the emphasis on “supposed to” because he knows that there’s no natural “supposed to” about it.
Well, obviously, it’s an obsession of the porn industry because, if it’s big and loose, then the girl is lose. Can’t have that. The porn star’s lips must look tight ‘n’ small, all the better to believe no one’s ever penetrated those lips ever before.
If our culture ever stops producing men with a Madonna/Whore complex, I’ll probably drop dead if I haven’t already bitten the dust. I could rant about the M/W complex, which is present in every single man I’ve ever known, but one and even he had issues every so often. But, seriously, men have to be the most hung-up-on-sex creatures on the planet. Women are, conventionally, supposed to have all the sex hang ups. Not true in my experience. It’s men who ultimately think that putting out is all about sharing your most intimate self, which is why they never really put out.
As for so-called Raunch Feminism I can’t work up enough to give a bat’s eyelash. Of course someone would be pacing and puffing over the phenom. It’s girls and women doing this horrid/crazy/weird/titillating thing that is going on among women. How often does anyone get in a tizzy over Raunch Masculinity, asking themselves whether or not it’s just natural or are these poor buoyz warped by Culture? When are people going to ask about the way men behave, “Is it real or is it Memorex?”
Huh?
So, Kipinis’s book looks like just another opportunity to wring one’s hands over the behavior of young people these days. Like Bill Cosby getting in a lather over black people who supposedly spend their money on sneakers rather than buy educational software (one of Cosby’s side businesses, btw). As if he knows, with any certainty, what Blacks do with their money.
I’d like to know who exactly is claiming that Raunch Feminism is liberatory. Hmmmm. Name me one feminist that does this?
I’m sure there is, but is there, like, an actual movement? And who cares anyway? Maybe it IS liberatory for them. Who is to say it’s not? Some asshole with 9 credits of undergraduate psych courses who thinks she can analyze the complicated lives of a handful of women on the basis of a few interviews?
Spare me.
Who’s it hurting if women bare their midriffs, wear fake nipples, and pull their thongs up well beyond their asscrack so you can admire it.
By the way, who wears a frickin’ thong anyway? I got a look at my almost DIL’s a few weeks ago. The dog likes to drag them out of the bedroom, drop to the floor near my feet, and have a good slobber fest all over her underwear. He also likes tampons. So, it’s this little “nude” barely there thong and I thought, “Why the fuck bother wearing this? Freeball it sweetie, because this thang ain’t doing nothin’ ‘cept riding up your crack.”
I can’t see the point to the dental floss thongs. They don’t keep your slacks out of your ass or prevent your skirt from getting tucked up in your crack, right? OK, so maybe I have a weird ass, but I can’t see how the thong is supposed to help me. I KNOW my skirt would get caught right up there and I’d be walking around looking like Miss Towle.
Maybe a raunch feminist can write and explain why dental floss thongs are worth wearing. Save money and join the Freeballers of America association!
So, back to my question: who does it hurt if women have sex like men or dress like, uh, sluts?
Do you honestly think that doing so sets women back? How?
Does acting white set blacks back? Does acting like the mythical wretched “thugs” that Cosby and WS the asschomp worry about set blacks back? If it does, maybe it’s just about the idiotic stereotypes we hold. And also ask yourself: would there be no more shit jobs and no more shit wages if every black acted white? Would women’s pay improve or the range of occupations expand if they started acting like men or started dressing less like, uh, ‘whores’? Would it change if they acted “ladylike”?
None of it’s helped yet. So, I think nothing much will change and nothing much is harmed if women engage in so-called “Raunch Feminism”. This economy thrives on poor wages and closed off opportunities. Not everyone can have a good job, a good paycheck, or a good education. It’s the nature of the system.
Maybe that’s why we have these stereotypes, eh?